<<< PREVIOUS
Policy Matters:
Insight from Civil Society Engaging with Science and Technology
NEXT >>>

Report As it happened >>> | Papers>>> | Presentations>>>
Paper on  
NPM Scaling up in Experiences in AP
 
by Ramanjaneyulu

 

Civil society was always engaged in establishing models of development on a smaller scale and lobby for changes in the dominant policy paradigm. While very few of them are accepted and adopted by the governments and international agencies, many are discounted questioning their relevance on a larger scale. In mainstreaming the accepted models, often governments try to fit them into the existing thinking and systems which often lead to failure. Rarely one gets an opportunity to design and implement the scaling up from a small experience.  The NPM scaling up in AP is one such good case to understand the nuances of scaling up.
  
Crisis looming over the agriculture based livelihoods in Andhra Pradesh is evident  
 
Andhra Pradesh has a history of witnessing spate Farmers Suicides every decade mainly due to failure of cotton crop.  In 1987-88 in Prakasham and Guntur districts more than 100 farmers died after the cotton crop failed due to heavy incidence of pests.  Many farmers from these districts have migrated to Telangana region where lands were available at lower prices for purchase and lease.  They again started to test their luck with cotton which initially showed promise. Others in the region also started adopting similar practices. The tentacles of the pesticide and seed industry have not spared them.  The costs of cultivations increased.  The problems with pests and seed also increased.  The crisis mounted and during 1997-98, hundreds of cases of suicides were reported from the Warangal and other cotton growing regions. During 2004-05, the year when the elections were fought and new government came to power more than 2000 farmers ended their lives in despair.  This time the incidents were not limited to cotton crop or dry land regions but spread across districts and farmers growing all kinds of crops. 
 
This crisis during 2004-05 forced the development organizations and state government to look for alternative models of agriculture which can sustain the livelihoods of the people depending on agriculture. The success of "Punukula" village in Khammam district with support from Centre for Sustainable Agriculture which sustained the farming by switching over to Non Pesticidal Management (NPM) has attracted the attention of the state and nation.  Hon"ble Minister for Agriculture, Raghuveera Reddy visited the village along with Agriculture Scientists and Department Officials and appreciated the effort done by the farmers. Prof. Jayati Ghosh, Chairperson of the Commission appointed by Government of Andhra Pradesh also visited the village and suggested to take up on a larger scale.   Learning from these experiences SERP (Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty-a society initiated by Government of AP to address the poverty issues in AP) has taken up NPM on a pilot basis in Kosigi Mandal of Mahboobnagar district with support of WASSAN and CSA during December"04 –April "05, covering 350 farmers growing red gram in 400 acres in 12 villages. The farmers could save more than Rs. 1500/acre on pest management. 
 
The successful grounding of NPM during 2004-05 has given important learning on how any ecologically sound and economically benefiting technology can be scaled up by providing proper institutional support.  Based on these experiences the program was initiated in 9 districts of Andhra Pradesh covering 25,000 acres and gradually extended to 18 districts in 2007-08.  The results were very encouraging and the response from farmers was enormous. The costs of cultivation could be brought down significantly and in most of the villages pesticide usage has come down by more than 70 %.  In the current year the program is implemented in about 1500 villages and plans indicate 5 lakh acres coverage during kharif and rabi.

 

Rolling out
 
Mass campaign: A state level campaign on the impacts of pesticides was initiated by CSA and network of NGOs  through Media, through Kalajatha(folk) in almost all the districts.    
 
Establishing field experience: Mandal has been taken as a unit with 3-5 villages, in each mandal with around 30-35 farmers in each village in the first year gradually covering the entire village in two years time.  Farmers were identified after an initial campaign on the alternatives is carried out. Villages were selected so that all are more or less in close vicinity. Districts were selected based on ongoing work, existing experience and areas where pesticide-related problems are high. In each district up to 5 mandals where pesticide usage is high were selected for implementation of the program.
 
Farmers" Field Schools: Farmers are grouped into Farmers" Field Schools (Sasyamitra Sangha). These are learning groups which meet regularly in the fields and learn by doing. Village Activist will coordinate the conduct of the field schools. Gradually they would be federated to form ‘Rythusanghas" at the village level.   Resource material in the form of manuals, flip charts, films are produced and given to every group.

 

In these districts, experienced NGOs from the Sustainable Agriculture Network (SANET) coordinated by Centre for Sustainable Agriculture (CSA) were identified and are associated with the programme. Initially two or three mandals were selected for facilitation by these NGOs.
 
In each village a practicing farmer is selected as village activist to coordinate the work. At the cluster level (of five villages) Cluster Coordinator helps in coordinating the work.  The Cluster Coordinators are trained regularly by the supporting NGOs.

 

Program Management with MMS: Continuing the spirit of SERP, the entire program is anchored with the Mandal Mahila Samakhyas" and their Village Organisations.  The Funds are released to the MMS and the Samakhya appoints Cluster Activists and enter into agreement with NGOs.  The program is regularly reviewed by the NPM sub committee at the VO, MMS and Zilla Samakyas.
 
Support is only in the form of technical support or any infrastructure like neem seed powder making units.
 
Committees with DRDA officials are also formed at the district level. At the state level State Executive Committee coordinates the work.
 
An Annual General Body Meeting will review the implementation, discuss and finalize the program and guidelines every year in February.
 

 

Grounding the work 2005-06
 
During 2005-06 NPM was initiated in 450 villages with 23000 acres in 9 districts.  All over 9 districts 11766 farmers with 22581 acres in both Kharif and Rabi implemented the program. Sixty two MMS, 150 Mandal level coordinators and 450 village activists are involved in the program.  This clearly established that a paradigm shift in understanding pest management both at farmers level and extension system level can effectively tackle the pest problem and also give ample benefits to farmers in terms of savings on input costs, health costs etc.  Better quality products from such production systems also fetch a better price to farmers and are highly preferred by discerning consumers (refer http://www.downtoearth.org.in/default20060531.htm). Also, the NPM intervention for the first time shifted the control in terms of production back to the farmer.

 

Community Managed Sustainable Agriculture 2006-07
 
The successful grounding of NPM during 2005-06 has given important learning on how any ecologically sound and economically benefiting technology can be scaled up by providing proper institutional support.  During 2006-07 more farmers in the same villages and more villages in the same districts and few newer districts joined the program.  The program covered 1250 villages in 17 districts covering wide variety of crops from groundnut, paddy to chillies and cotton.  Program expanded to districts like Guntur where the pesticide problem is serious and north coastal Andhra Pradesh where the productivities are in general low.  The program is implemented in Adilabad, Ananthapur, Chittor, Guntur, Kadapa, Karimnagar, Khammam, Kurnool, Mahaboobnagar, Medak, Nalgonda, Nellore, Ranga Reddy, Srikakulam, Visakhapatnam, Vizianagaram and Warangal. More than 80,000 farmers are cultivating about 1.8 lakh acres.  In addition to pest management, initiations on soil productivity management and seed management have begun on a small scale.  Agriculture credit from formal banks was mobilised in 3 districts to the tune of 15 crores.
 
In addition to NPM, efforts were initiated to establish seed networks so that farmers produce and share their seed.  The pilot in Ananthapur has shown good results.  In addition efforts are also began to have non chemical soil productivity improvement practices based on the experiences of the villages like ‘Yenabavi" in Warangal which became the first organic village in the state.
 
The benefits are not only seen in areas of high pesticide use but in areas of low pesticide use.  The crop could be saved from the pests and diseases and managed well instilling new interest in the farmers.
 
The Community Seed Banks were piloted in 12 villages of Ananthapur which showed very encouraging results.  The farmers could produce and share seed with fellow farmers at the village level in crops like groundnut, paddy and pulses.
 
During 2006-07 while the institutional systems are further strengthened focus was also given to specific commodities like paddy and groundnut in Kurnool district, red gram in Mahaboobnagar, cotton in Warangal and Khammam and chillies in Guntur.  The marketing links were explored.  The NPM products were in demand and could command premium in the market.  The local processing and marketing of the commodities have also brought in additional benefits to the farmers.
 
This scaling up experience in AP has broken the myth that pesticides are inevitable in agriculture and also given important lessons on the paradigm shift in technology, institutional systems and support systems required for sustaining agriculture especially of small and marginal farmers.

 

Consolidating experiences and converging efforts 2007-08
 
During 2007-08 the program will be consolidated in the existing villages and star procurement centres of SERP.  In the villages which are in second year, works on soil productivity management with local resources and local seed management have been planned.
 
This year Spices Board came forward to support the NPM program for chilli crop.  Hon"ble Minister for Commerce Dr. Jairam Ramesh promised to bring at least 50 % of the chillies area under NPM.  Sixty percent of the chillies exports are from Andhra Pradesh and often the export consignments (included the processed products like pickles) are rejected due to chemical pesticide residues.
 
This year all the star procurement centres of SERP are also brought under NPM so that the production and market linkages can be easily established.  The marketing Community Resource Persons are also trained in NPM and would be used in the program.  Similarly best performing villages are identified as resource villages and best practicing farmers are identified as community resource persons who will help in further scaling up of the program.
 
This year the program covers more than 5 lakh acres across 18 districts (Nizamabad is added) covering all the farmers in about 2000 villages.  This year the program will also be integrated with on going programs like NREGA to provide further employment opportunities to the agriculture workers.

 

Dialogue with mainstream institutions
 
One of objectives of engaging in scaling up process is to establish NPM on a sizeable scale to convince Agriculture Department and University and Research Institutions that there needs to be a paradigm shift in pest management which is today caught largely in pesticides and GM crops. 
 
Twice discussions were held with the Krishi Vigyan Kendras.  During March 2006, after a day of field visit and two day discussions the scientists were convinced and came forward to carry out research and demonstrations on the NPM but the Director Extension, Acharya NG Ranga Agriculture University and Scientists in Zonal Coordinating Unit, ICAR were opposing saying there is no scientific evidence. Two NGO KVKs took the lead and continued the work. During 2007 again a discussion was held with KVKs, with Minister for Rural Development taking the lead.  NGOs were not present in the meeting and the discussions were led by the bureaucrats in Rural Development Department.  The KVKs agreed to work with the women SHGs on the seed production but on NPM only the NGO KVKs continued to work.
 
During 2006-07, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture has carried out a study on NPM/Pesticide used Non Bt and Bt cotton fields in Warangal and concluded that Non Bt cotton with NPM is more profitable to the farmers and the yields are on par.
 
A study done by CSA on pesticide recommendations in vegetables showed that majority of the pesticide recommendations by the horticulture department are not registered with Central Insecticides Board which is mandatory. Even some of the recommendations of Agriculture University were not registered.
 
The current status 
 
The gap seems to be more of differences in personal and institutional beliefs and interests rather than technology per se.
 

  

Constraints in moving forward 
o        Large scale shifts in land use pattern and increasing costs of land
o        GM crops
o        Farmers loosing control over resources like seed, water etc
o        Liberalization impacts
o        Climate change
 


Conclusions 

<<< PREVIOUS
NEXT >>>